Researcher: FDA Uses “Preposterous” Analysis to Approve Vaccines for Kids
PhD researcher Toby Rogers exposes what he describes as “junk science”
Featured Headlines Health and Science
In an article entitled, “Ten red flags in the FDA’s risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer’s EUA application to inject American children 5 to 11 with its mRNA product,” PhD researcher Toby Rogers exposes what he describes as “junk science” within the Food and Drug Administration’s risk-benefit analysis that led to the FDA approving a milder dose of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for children 5-11 years old.
Rogers says:
The FDA’s risk-benefit analysis in connection with Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject children ages 5 to 11 with their COVID-19 vaccine is one of the shoddiest documents I’ve ever seen.
He goes on to list ten “red flags” with the FDA’s analysis, including:
COVID-19 rates in children ages 5 to 11 are so low that there were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 and ZERO cases of death from COVID in either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750). This means that there is literally no emergency to justify Emergency Use Authorization in this case.
Pfizer’s clinical trial in kids was intentionally undersized to hide harms.
Pfizer intentionally wipes out the control group as soon as they can by vaccinating all of the kids who initially got the placebo.
Rogers quotes Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who points out that mass vaccination turns kids into shedders of more infectious variants:
Under no circumstances should young and healthy people be vaccinated as it will only erode their protective innate immunity towards Coronaviruses (CoV) and other respiratory viruses. Their innate immunity normally/ naturally largely protects them and provides a kind of herd immunity in that it dilutes infectious CoV pressure at the level of the population, whereas mass vaccination turns them into shedders of more infectious variants. Children/ youngsters who get the disease mostly develop mild to moderate disease and as a result continue to contribute to herd immunity by developing broad and long-lived immunity. If you are vaccinated and get the disease, you may develop life-long immunity too but why would you take the risk of getting vaccinated, especially when you’re young and healthy? Firstly, there is the risk of potential side effects; secondarily, there is the ever increasing risk that your vaccinal antibodies will no longer be functional while still binding to the virus, thereby increasing the likelihood of ADE or even severe disease….”
He goes on to describe the FDA as having it “exactly backwards,” stating, “they want to prevent mild COVID in children which reduces herd immunity and they just flat out lie about the harms from myocarditis” before concluding:
The FDA briefing document is a work of fiction and it must be withdrawn immediately. If the FDA continues with this grotesque charade it will cause irreparable harms to children and the FDA leadership will one day be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.